Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 13.054
Filtrar
1.
J Diabetes ; 16(5): e13553, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prediabetes management is a priority for policymakers globally, to avoid/delay type 2 diabetes (T2D) and reduce severe, costly health consequences. Countries moving from low to middle income are most at risk from the T2D "epidemic" and may find implementing preventative measures challenging; yet prevention has largely been evaluated in developed countries. METHODS: Markov cohort simulations explored costs and benefits of various prediabetes management approaches, expressed as "savings" to the public health care system, for three countries with high prediabetes prevalence and contrasting economic status (Poland, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam). Two scenarios were compared up to 15 y: "inaction" (no prediabetes intervention) and "intervention" with metformin extended release (ER), intensive lifestyle change (ILC), ILC with metformin (ER), or ILC with metformin (ER) "titration." RESULTS: T2D was the highest-cost health state at all time horizons due to resource use, and inaction produced the highest T2D costs, ranging from 9% to 34% of total health care resource costs. All interventions reduced T2D versus inaction, the most effective being ILC + metformin (ER) "titration" (39% reduction at 5 y). Metformin (ER) was the only strategy that produced net saving across the time horizon; however, relative total health care system costs of other interventions vs inaction declined over time up to 15 y. Viet Nam was most sensitive to cost and parameter changes via a one-way sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin (ER) and lifestyle interventions for prediabetes offer promise for reducing T2D incidence. Metformin (ER) could reduce T2D patient numbers and health care costs, given concerns regarding adherence in the context of funding/reimbursement challenges for lifestyle interventions.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipoglucemiantes , Cadenas de Markov , Metformina , Estado Prediabético , Humanos , Estado Prediabético/economía , Estado Prediabético/terapia , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/economía , Vietnam/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ahorro de Costo , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estilo de Vida , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8853, 2024 04 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632289

RESUMEN

Individual testing of samples is time- and cost-intensive, particularly during an ongoing pandemic. Better practical alternatives to individual testing can significantly decrease the burden of disease on the healthcare system. Herein, we presented the clinical validation of Segtnan™ on 3929 patients. Segtnan™ is available as a mobile application entailing an AI-integrated personalized risk assessment approach with a novel data-driven equation for pooling of biological samples. The AI was selected from a comparison between 15 machine learning classifiers (highest accuracy = 80.14%) and a feed-forward neural network with an accuracy of 81.38% in predicting the rRT-PCR test results based on a designed survey with minimal clinical questions. Furthermore, we derived a novel pool-size equation from the pooling data of 54 published original studies. The results demonstrated testing capacity increase of 750%, 60%, and 5% at prevalence rates of 0.05%, 22%, and 50%, respectively. Compared to Dorfman's method, our novel equation saved more tests significantly at high prevalence, i.e., 28% (p = 0.006), 40% (p = 0.00001), and 66% (p = 0.02). Lastly, we illustrated the feasibility of the Segtnan™ usage in clinically complex settings like emergency and psychiatric departments.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Prevalencia , Ahorro de Costo , Aprendizaje Automático , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Nursing ; 54(5): 56-61, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640037

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: A strong link exists between adequate supply chain management and nurse efficiency and satisfaction. Implementing Lean methodology, specifically 5S process improvement, staff created a unit-based supply room that was clean, safe, and well organized which led to reduced waste, greater efficiency, and cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales , Humanos , Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
4.
PeerJ ; 12: e17054, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436007

RESUMEN

Homozygous α0-thalassemia (SEA deletion) or Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis syndrome is a significant public health issue in Thailand and Southeast Asia. A prevention and control program has been implemented in this region. This study focuses on retrospective laboratory data collected between January 2021 and April 2023 at a single center. Additionally, we developed a low-cost LAMP-turbidimetric assay to propose in the screening strategy. A total of 3,623 samples underwent screening tests (MCV, MCH, and DCIP), including 1,658 couple screenings (84.25%) and 310 single pregnant screenings (15.75%). Negative screenings, which did not require further investigation, were found in 75.51% for couple screenings and 46.58% for single pregnant screenings. At hemoglobin (Hb) analysis identified 129 couples which had fetuses at risk of severe thalassemia, whereas molecular analysis during the retrospective period revealed 210 samples with different genotypes. These remaining samples were validated using the low-cost LAMP-turbidimetric assay to detect α0-thalassemia (SEA deletion). The developed LAMP turbidimetric assay demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (36/36 × 100) and 97.7% (170/174 × 100), respectively, when compared with gap-PCR. Furthermore, we propose a strategy involving the addition of the low-cost LAMP-turbidimetric assay before performing the gold standard. This strategy represents a cost-saving of USD 2,608 based on 210 samples that required DNA analysis. Finally, the developed LAMP turbidimetric assays offer advantages such as reduced time, workload, cost savings, no need for highly developed instruments, and a straightforward interpreting process. Therefore, implementation of LAMP assays into routine settings would be improve the efficiency of prevention and control program for severe thalassemia disease in this region.


Asunto(s)
Hidropesía Fetal , Talasemia alfa , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tailandia/epidemiología , Hidropesía Fetal/diagnóstico , Talasemia alfa/diagnóstico , Ahorro de Costo
5.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 30: 10760296241237228, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439661

RESUMEN

Cangrelor is a rapid-acting, intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor that can be used in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention who require mechanical circulatory support or as a bridge to procedure. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who received platelet function testing (PFT) with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay while on cangrelor from March 2021 through November 2022. All patients were initiated on 0.75 mcg/kg/min of cangrelor with P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) values collected 12-24 h after initiation. Cangrelor doses were adjusted per protocol to maintain PRU values of 85-208. A total of 42 patients were included. Thirty-eight patients (90.5%) required temporary mechanical circulatory support while on cangrelor, and 4 patients (9.5%) received cangrelor as a bridge to procedure. The median cangrelor maintenance dose was 0.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.375-0.75) mcg/kg/min, and the median time in therapeutic range with a PRU value between 85 and 208 was 66.6% (IQR: 39.6%-100%). No patients experienced stent thrombosis. A composite major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 4 patients (9.5%), and major bleeding occurred in 16 patients (38.1%). Compared to empiric cangrelor dosing of 0.75 mcg/kg/min, PFT-guided cangrelor dose adjustment was associated with a median drug cost savings of $1605.60 (IQR: $0-4281.56). Utilizing PFT with cangrelor may allow for lower, individualized dosing while preventing stent thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Trombosis , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Administración Intravenosa , Ahorro de Costo
6.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(4): 336-344, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specialty pharmacists monitor patients taking multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to evaluate response to therapy and intervene on adverse effects. These interventions have the potential to avoid health care costs by discontinuing inappropriate therapies and avoiding downstream health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the costs avoided by specialty pharmacist interventions in MS. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study including patients at the Vanderbilt MS Clinic who received a specialty pharmacist intervention between February 1, 2022, and July 31, 2022, was performed. A panel of 3 investigators categorized each intervention based on the potential for cost avoidance: (1) no cost avoidance, (2) direct cost avoidance, and (3) indirect cost avoidance. A single intervention may have one or both cost avoidance types. Direct costs avoided included the cost of the potential service or medication avoided due to the intervention. Medication costs were calculated using the range of the average wholesale price and average wholesale price - 20%. For indirect costs avoided, the range of costs of a consequence (self-care, ambulatory visit, emergency department visit, hospitalization, or death) occurring had the intervention not been performed were multiplied by the range of probabilities for the consequence occurring (from zero [0] to very likely [0.5]). Self-care indirect cost savings equated to $0. Descriptive statistics summarized types of pharmacist interventions, the patients impacted, and costs avoided. In patients with an intervention that resulted in cost avoidance, chart review was performed to collect patient demographics, disease history, and MS-related health care usage during the 12 months prior to the pharmacist intervention. RESULTS: 485 pharmacist interventions in 354 individual patients were included. Fifty interventions in 38 individual patients (76% female, median age 51 years, 68% White) resulted in cost avoidance. The total estimated costs avoided in 6 months ranged from $123,733 to $156,265. In total, $138,410 were direct costs and $1,890 were indirect costs. Reasons for direct costs avoided (n = 13) were often safety monitoring (69%) or common side effects management (23%). Indirect costs avoidance (n = 37) resulted primarily from interventions on common side effects management (57%) and safety monitoring (22%). Self-care was the most common type of indirect cost avoided (n = 27). Interventions resulting in costs avoided were commonly seen in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (82%). The median time from MS diagnosis was 15 years and 42% of patients had previously trialed 1 other MS DMT. CONCLUSIONS: There is a potential for significant health care savings after specialty pharmacist interventions in MS, primarily from preventing the dispensing of inappropriate therapies.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacéuticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Ahorro de Costo
7.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(3): 372-380, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437612

RESUMEN

The use of many services is lower in Medicare Advantage (MA) compared with traditional Medicare, generating cost savings for insurers, whereas the quality of ambulatory services is higher. This study examined the role of selective contracting with providers in achieving these outcomes, focusing on primary care physicians. Assessing primary care physician costliness based on the gap between observed and predicted costs for their traditional Medicare patients, we found that the average primary care physician in MA networks was $433 less costly per patient (2.9 percent of baseline) compared with the regional mean, with less costly primary care physicians included in more networks than more costly ones. Favorable selection of patients by MA primary care physicians contributed partially to this result. The quality measures of MA primary care physicians were similar to the regional mean. In contrast, primary care physicians excluded from all MA networks were $1,617 (13.8 percent) costlier than the regional mean, with lower quality. Primary care physicians in narrow networks were $212 (1.4 percent) less costly than those in wide networks, but their quality was slightly lower. These findings highlight the potential role of selective contracting in reducing costs in the MA program.


Asunto(s)
Medicare Part C , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Ahorro de Costo , Aseguradoras
8.
Artículo en Inglés | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-59324

RESUMEN

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. The rational use of medicines offers a cost-saving strategy to maximize therapeutic outcomes for developing and developed countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rational use of medicines for selected noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) at three pharmacies at public hospitals in Jamaica using the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) prescribing indicators. Methods. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, prescriptions for adult outpatients containing at least one medicine for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma that were filled between January and July 2019 were reviewed using WHO’s prescribing indicators for the rational use of medicines. Data were analyzed and expressed as descriptive and inferential statistics. For all analyses conducted, significance was determined at P < 0.05. Results. A total of 1500 prescriptions covering 5979 medicines were reviewed; prescriptions were mostly written for female patients aged 42–60 years. Polypharmacy was observed in 35.6% (534) of prescriptions, and there was an average of 4 medicines per prescription, with a maximum of 17. Most of the prescriptions at each site were filled, with the main reason for not dispensing a medicine being that it was out of stock. Generic prescribing was high for all sites, accounting for more than 95% (5722) of prescribed medicines. There was full compliance with prescribing according to the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines at two of the sites, but it was just off the target at Site 1, by 1.4%. Conclusions. The WHO guidelines for the rational use of medicines were followed with respect to the proportion of medicines prescribed from the WHO Model List and the proportion of antibiotics prescribed. The number of medicines per prescription and the proportion of medicines prescribed by generic name did not meet the WHO criteria. However, prescribing was aligned with treatment guidelines for the selected NCDs.


[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. El uso racional de los medicamentos proporciona una estrategia de ahorro de costos para maximizar los resultados terapéuticos tanto en los países en desarrollo como en los países desarrollados. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el uso racional de medicamentos para algunas enfermedades no transmisibles (ENT) seleccionadas en tres farmacias de hospitales públicos de Jamaica, usando los indicadores de prescripción de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Métodos. En este estudio transversal retrospectivo se examinaron las prescripciones realizadas a pacientes ambulatorios adultos que incluían al menos un medicamento para enfermedades cardiovasculares, diabetes, cáncer, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica o asma, dispensadas entre enero y julio del 2019, utilizando los indicadores de prescripción para el uso racional de medicamentos de la OMS. Los datos se analizaron y expresaron mediante estadística descriptiva e inferencial. Para todos los análisis realizados se estableció un nivel de significación de p <0,05. Resultados. Se examinó un total de 1 500 prescripciones que incluían 5 979 medicamentos; la mayor parte de ellas correspondían a pacientes de sexo femenino de 42 a 60 años. Se observó que había polimedicación en el 35,6% (534) de las prescripciones, con un promedio de 4 y un máximo de 17 medicamentos por receta. En todos los centros se dispensó la mayor parte de los medicamentos prescritos, y el motivo principal para no hacerlo fue la falta de existencias del medicamento en cuestión. La prescripción de genéricos fue elevada en todos los centros y supuso más del 95% (5 722) de los medicamentos prescritos. En dos centros la prescripción se realizó en su totalidad de acuerdo con la Lista Modelo de Medicamentos Esenciales de la OMS, pero en el centro 1 no se alcanzó el objetivo por un 1,4%. Conclusiones. Se siguieron las directrices de la OMS para el uso racional de medicamentos en cuanto a la proporción de medicamentos prescritos de la Lista Modelo de la OMS y la proporción de antibióticos prescritos. El número de medicamentos por receta y la proporción de medicamentos prescritos mediante su nombre genérico no cumplieron con los criterios de la OMS. Sin embargo, las prescripciones estaban en consonancia con las directrices de tratamiento de las enfermedades no transmisibles seleccionadas.


[RESUMO]. Objetivo. O uso racional de medicamentos é uma estratégia de contenção de custos para maximizar os resultados terapêuticos em países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o uso racional de medicamentos para algumas doenças não transmissíveis selecionadas em três farmácias de hospitais públicos na Jamaica a partir dos indicadores de prescrição preconizados pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Métodos. Estudo transversal retrospectivo que avaliou receitas médicas de pacientes ambulatoriais adul- tos contendo pelo menos um medicamento prescrito para doença cardiovascular, diabetes, câncer, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica ou asma e dispensadas entre janeiro e julho de 2019. A avaliação foi realizada a partir dos indicadores de prescrição preconizados pela OMS para o uso racional de medicamentos. Os dados obtidos foram analisados por meio de estatísticas descritivas e inferenciais. O nível de significância de p <0,05 foi adotado em todas as análises. Resultados. Ao todo, foram analisadas 1 500 receitas médicas compreendendo 5 979 medicamentos. Em sua maioria, as receitas foram prescritas para pacientes do sexo feminino com idades entre 42 e 60 anos. A polifarmácia foi observada em 35,6% (534) das receitas; em média, foram prescritos 4 medicamentos, até um máximo de 17. As farmácias estudadas dispensaram a maior parte dos medicamentos receitados. O principal motivo para não fornecer algum medicamento foi o desabastecimento. O percentual de medicamentos genéricos foi alto em todos os locais, representando mais de 95% (5 722) do volume receitado. Houve plena observância da Lista Modelo de Medicamentos Essenciais da OMS nas receitas analisadas em dois dos locais estudos, e observância quase completa (diferença de 1,4%) no local 1. Conclusões. As diretrizes da OMS de uso racional de medicamentos foram cumpridas no que se refere ao percentual de medicamentos receitados de acordo com a Lista Modelo da OMS e o percentual de antibióticos receitados. Os critérios da OMS não foram cumpridos quanto ao número de medicamentos por receita e ao percentual receitado usando o nome genérico. Porém, os medicamentos foram receitados de acordo com as diretrizes terapêuticas para as doenças não transmissíveis selecionadas.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Medicamentos , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Medicamentos Esenciales , Usos Terapéuticos , Ahorro de Costo , Desarrollo Sostenible , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Medicamentos Esenciales , Usos Terapéuticos , Ahorro de Costo , Desarrollo Sostenible , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Medicamentos Esenciales , Usos Terapéuticos , Ahorro de Costo , Desarrollo Sostenible
9.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 25(3): 539-544.e2, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307120

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The structured, clinically supervised withdrawal of medicines, known as deprescribing, is one strategy to address inappropriate polypharmacy. This study aimed to evaluate the costs and consequences of deprescribing in frail older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Australia. DESIGN: A within-trial cost-consequence analysis of a deprescribing intervention-Opti-Med. The Opti-Med double-blind randomized controlled trial of deprescribing included 3 groups: blinded control, blinded intervention, and an open intervention group. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen RACFs in Western Australia and New South Wales. Participants were 303 older people living in participating RACFs from March 2014 to February 2019. METHODS: Analysis was conducted from the health sector perspective. Health economic outcomes assessed include cost saved from deprescribed medicines and the incremental quality-adjusted life-years. Costs were presented in 2022 Australian dollars. RESULTS: The total cost of the Opti-Med intervention was $239.13 per participant. The costs saved through deprescribed medicines over 12 months after adjusting for mortality within the trial period was $328.90 per participant in the blinded intervention group and $164.00 per participant in the open intervention group. On average, the cost of the intervention was more than offset by the cost saved from deprescribed medicines. Extrapolating these findings to the Australian population suggests a potential net cost saving of about $1 to $16 million per annum for the health system nationally. The incremental quality-adjusted life-years were very similar across the 3 groups within the trial period. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Deprescribing for frail older people living in RACFs can be a cost-saving intervention without reducing the quality of life. Systemwide implementation of deprescribing across RACFs in Australia has the potential to improve health care delivery through the cost savings, which could be reapplied to further optimize care within RACFs.


Asunto(s)
Deprescripciones , Humanos , Anciano , Australia , Anciano Frágil , Calidad de Vida , Ahorro de Costo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud
10.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 33(5): 107662, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417567

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early in-patient MR Imaging may assist in identifying stroke etiology, facilitating prompt secondary prevention for ischemic strokes (IS), and potentially enhancing patient outcomes. This study explores the impact of early in patient MRI on IS patient outcomes and healthcare resource use beyond the hyper-acute stage. METHODS: In this retrospective registry-based study, 771 admitted transient ischemic attack (TIA) and IS patients at Halifax's QEII Health Centre from 2015 to 2019 underwent in-patient MRI. Cohort was categorized into two groups based on MRI timing: early (within 48 h) and late. Logistic regression and Poisson log-linear models, adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, acute stroke protocol (ASP) activation, thrombolytic, and thrombectomy, were employed to examine in-hospital, discharge, post-discharge, and healthcare resource utilization outcomes. RESULTS: Among the cohort, 39.6 % received early in-patient MRI. ASP activation and TIA were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving early MRI. Early MRI was independently associated with a lower rate of symptomatic changes in neurological status during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.88), higher odds of good functional outcomes at discharge (1.55; 1.11-2.16), lower rate of non-home discharge (0.65; 0.46-0.91), shorter length of stay (regression coefficient, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.89-0.97), and reduced direct cost of hospitalization (0.77; 0.75-0.79). CONCLUSION: Early in-patient MRI utilization in IS patients post-hyper-acute stage was independently associated with improved patient outcomes and decreased healthcare resource utilization, underscoring the potential benefits of early MRI during in-patient management of IS. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is warranted to validate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ahorro de Costo , Cuidados Posteriores , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/efectos adversos
11.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 78(3): 644-652, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38334232

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The safety, efficacy, and cost savings associated with biosimilar medications are well established. However, a lack of pediatric data exists surrounding clinical outcomes when switching from an originator to a biosimilar. Our primary aim is to evaluate clinical outcomes following a nonmedical switch from the infliximab originator to a biosimilar in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our secondary aim is to estimate cost savings associated with this switch. METHODS: A quality improvement project was implemented to establish safe switching protocols, then those patients who underwent a nonmedical switch from the infliximab originator to the biosimilar were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, physician global assessments (PGAs), and laboratory values were recorded 1 year pre- and post-switch. Continuation rates on the biosimilar were reported at 6 and 12 months. Cost savings were estimated using two different pricing models. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent a nonmedical switch. Laboratory values including inflammatory markers, infliximab levels, and PGA scores remained similar when assessed pre- and post-switch. No infusion reactions or antidrug antibody development occurred. Two patients reported psoriasis-like rashes. Five patients switched back to the originator during the study period. There were 379 biosimilar infusions completed with an estimated total cost savings of $11,260 (average sales price) and $566,223 (wholesale acquisition cost). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical remission rates, inflammatory laboratory markers, serious adverse events, infliximab levels, and antidrug antibodies remained similar after a one-time nonmedical switch to an infliximab biosimilar. Nonmedical switching to biosimilars resulted in significant cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Niño , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ahorro de Costo , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico
12.
Am Heart J ; 271: 20-27, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365072

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: US adults often overpay for generic prescription medications, which can lead to medication nonadherence that negatively impacts cardiovascular outcomes. As a result, new direct-to-consumer online medication services are growing in popularity nationwide. Amazon recently launched a $5/month direct-to-consumer medication subscription service (Amazon RxPass), but it is unclear how many US adults could save on out-of-pocket drug costs by using this new service. OBJECTIVES: To estimate out-of-pocket savings on generic prescription medications achievable through Amazon's new direct-to-consumer subscription medication service for adults with cardiovascular risk factors and/or conditions. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of adults 18-64 years in the 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: Of the 25,280,517 (SE ± 934,809) adults aged 18-64 years with cardiovascular risk factors or conditions who were prescribed at least 1 medication available in the Amazon RxPass formulary, only 6.4% (1,624,587 [SE ± 68,571]) would achieve savings. Among those achieving savings, the estimated average out-of-pocket savings would be $140 (SE ± $15.8) per person per year, amounting to a total savings of $228,093,570 (SE ± $26,117,241). In multivariable regression models, lack of insurance coverage (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95%CI 1.9-6.5) and being prescribed a greater number of RxPass-eligible medications (2-3 medications versus 1 medication: OR 5.6, 95%CI 3.0-10.3; 4+ medications: OR 21.8, 95%CI 10.7-44.3) were each associated with a higher likelihood of achieving out-of-pocket savings from RxPass. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the pricing structure of Amazon's direct-to-consumer medication service are needed to expand out-of-pocket savings on generic medications to a larger segment of the working-age adults with cardiovascular risk factors and/or diseases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Costos de los Medicamentos , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Ahorro de Costo , Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía
13.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 70, 2024 Feb 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389067

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is now proposed as the standard of care in elective major abdominal surgery. Implementation of the ERAS protocol in emergency setting has been proposed but his economic impact has not been investigated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the cost saving of implementing ERAS in abdominal emergency surgery in a single institution. METHODS: A group of 80 consecutive patients treated by ERAS protocol for gastrointestinal emergency surgery in 2021 was compared with an analogue group of 75 consecutive patients treated by the same surgery the year before implementation of ERAS protocol. Adhesion to postoperative items, length of stay, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Cost saving analysis was performed. RESULTS: 50% Adhesion to postoperative items was reached on day 2 in the ERAS group in mean. Laparoscopic approach was 40 vs 12% in ERAS and control group respectively (p ,002). Length of stay was shorter in ERAS group by 3 days (9 vs 12 days p ,002). Morbidity and mortality rate were similar in both groups. The ERAS group had a mean cost saving of 1022,78 € per patient. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol implementation in the abdominal emergency setting is cost effective resulting in a significant shorter length of stay and cost saving per patient.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Humanos , Ahorro de Costo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Tiempo de Internación
14.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(5): 721-728, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220041

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to uncover potential areas for cost savings in uterine artery embolization (UAE) using time-driven activity-based costing, the most accurate costing methodology for direct health care system costs. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients who underwent outpatient UAE for fibroids or adenomyosis between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Utilization times were captured from electronic health record time stamps and staff interviews using validated techniques. Capacity cost rates were estimated using institutional data and manufacturer proxy prices. Costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing for personnel, equipment, and consumables. Differences in time utilization and costs between procedures by an interventional radiology attending physician only versus an interventional radiology attending physician and trainee were additionally performed. RESULTS: The mean total cost of UAE was $4,267 ± $1,770, the greatest contributor being consumables (51%; $2,162 ± $811), followed by personnel (33%; $1,388 ± $340) and equipment (7%; $309 ± $96). Embolic agents accounted for the greatest proportion of consumable costs, accounting for 51% ($1,273 ± $789), followed by vascular devices (15%; $630 ± $143). The cost of embolic agents was highly variable, driven mainly by the number of vials (range 1-19) of tris-acryl gelatin particles used. Interventional radiology attending physician only cases had significantly lower personnel costs ($1,091 versus $1,425, P = .007) and equipment costs ($268 versus $317, P = .007) compared with interventional radiology attending physician and trainee cases, although there was no significant difference in mean overall costs ($3,640 versus $4,386; P = .061). CONCLUSIONS: Consumables accounted for the majority of total cost of UAE, driven by the cost of embolic agents and vascular devices.


Asunto(s)
Leiomioma , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina , Humanos , Femenino , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Leiomioma/terapia , Leiomioma/economía , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Radiología Intervencionista/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/economía , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo , Radiografía Intervencional/economía
16.
J Am Coll Surg ; 238(4): 404-413, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224109

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Variability in operating room supply cost is a modifiable cause of suboptimal resource use and low value of care (outcomes vs cost). This study describes implementation of a quality improvement intervention to decrease operating room supply costs. STUDY DESIGN: An automated electronic health record data pipeline harmonized operating room supply cost data with patient and case characteristics and outcomes. For inpatient procedures, predicted mortality and length of stay were used to calculate observed-to-expected ratios and value of care using validated equations. For commonly performed (1 or more per week) procedures, the pipeline generated figures illustrating individual surgeon performance vs peers, costs for each surgeon performing each case type, and control charts identifying out-of-control cases and surgeons with more than 90th percentile costs, which were shared with surgeons and division chiefs alongside guidance for modifying case-specific supply instructions to operating room nurses and technicians. RESULTS: Preintervention control (1,064 cases for 7 months) and postintervention (307 cases for 2 months) cohorts had similar baseline characteristics across all 16 commonly performed procedures. Median costs per case were lower in the intervention cohort ($811 [$525 to $1,367] vs controls: $1,080 [$603 to $1,574], p < 0.001), as was the incidence of out-of-control cases (19 (6.2%) vs 110 (10.3%), p = 0.03). Duration of surgery, length of stay, discharge disposition, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates were similar between cohorts. Value of care was higher in the intervention cohort (1.1 [0.1 to 1.5] vs 1.0 [0.2 to 1.4], p = 0.04). Pipeline runtime was 16:07. CONCLUSIONS: An automated, sustainable quality improvement intervention was associated with decreased operating room supply costs and increased value of care.


Asunto(s)
Quirófanos , Cirujanos , Humanos , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ahorro de Costo , Tiempo de Internación
17.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 110(4_Suppl): 30-37, 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266300

RESUMEN

In designing mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns, it is imperative to consider contextual factors that affect uptake of the intervention, including acceptability, cost, feasibility, and health system considerations, to ensure optimal coverage. We reviewed the literature on contextual factors influencing MDA delivery to provide programs with information to design a successful campaign. From 1,044 articles screened, 37 included contextual factors relevant to participants' values and preferences, drivers of MDA acceptability, health equity concerns, financial and economic aspects, and feasibility barriers; 13 included relevant modeling data. Key findings were abstracted by two reviewers and summarized. No studies directly assessed values or direct health equity concerns with respect to MDA, which represents an evidence gap as unequal distributions of effects and factors that impact participant acceptability and program feasibility must be considered to ensure equitable access. Participant acceptability was the most widely surveyed factor, appearing in 28 of 37 studies; perceived adverse events were a frequently noted cause of nonparticipation, mentioned in 15 studies. Feasibility considerations included when, where, and how drugs will be delivered and how to address pregnant women, as these can all have substantial implications for participation. Mass drug administration costs (∼$1.04 to $19.40 per person per round) are driven primarily by drug prices, but the delivery mechanism can have varying costs as well, and integration with other interventions may provide cost savings. Both programmatic goals and sociopolitical and economic contexts must be carefully considered before embarking on an MDA program to ensure programmatic success.


Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Administración Masiva de Medicamentos , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Ahorro de Costo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 24(4): 509-519, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284223

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Biosimilars have improved access to biologic medicines; however, historical thinking may jeopardize the viability of future markets. AREAS COVERED: An expert panel of eight diverse European stakeholders provided insights about rethinking biosimilars and cost-savings, reducing patient access inequalities, increasing inter-market equity, and improving education. The insights reported here (Part 2) follow a study that provides perspectives on leveraging the holistic benefits of biosimilars for market sustainability based on independent survey results and telephone interviews of stakeholders from diverse biosimilar markets (Part 1). Directional recommendations are provided for payers. EXPERT OPINION: The panel's market maturity framework for biosimilars has three stages: 'Invest,' 'Expand' and 'Harvest.' Across market stages, re-thinking the benefits of biosimilars beyond cost-savings, considering earlier or expanded access/new indications, product innovations, and re-investment of biosimilar-generated cost-savings should be communicated to stakeholders to promote further engagement. During 'Expand' and 'Harvest' stages, development of efficient, forward-looking procurement systems and mechanisms that drive uptake and stabilize competition between manufacturers are key. Future biosimilars will target various therapy areas beyond those targeted by existing biosimilars. To ensure a healthy, accessible future market, stakeholders must align their objectives, communicate, collaborate, and coordinate via education, incentivization, and procurement, to maximize the totality of benefits.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Humanos , Aprobación de Drogas , Europa (Continente) , Ahorro de Costo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
J Infus Nurs ; 47(1): 19-29, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211611

RESUMEN

Biologic drugs are large, complex molecules produced through biotechnology. A biosimilar is a biologic product that is highly similar to an already approved biologic (reference product), with no clinically meaningful differences in purity, safety, or efficacy; as such, a biosimilar does not need to undergo the same level of study in a clinical trial program as the original reference product. Due to the potential impact of biosimilars on patient access and health care systems, the US Food and Drug Administration introduced an abbreviated pathway for approving biosimilars (351[k]) in 2009. There is strong evidence that switching from a reference product to a biosimilar does not reduce treatment effectiveness or increase the risk of adverse events. Biosimilars may reduce costs and increase patient access to biologic therapies. Biosimilar use in the United States has increased, as have the associated biosimilar cost savings, which are expected to reach $104 billion between 2020 and 2024. Yet, a need remains for increased knowledge among health care professionals and patients. Prescriber confidence is key to patient acceptance of biosimilars and minimizing the incidence of the nocebo effect. Infusion nurses are well positioned to help educate patients and to improve clinical outcomes across a range of diseases.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas , United States Food and Drug Administration , Personal de Salud , Ahorro de Costo
20.
Urology ; 183: 127-133, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951363

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost analysis of generic and brand-name Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors at different dosages and pharmacies across the US. METHODS: Using an all-payer retail pharmacy-claims database, we analyzed prescription drug data for three generic and six brand-name oral PDE5 inhibitors at different dosages across US chain and independent pharmacies in 2019. RESULTS: We obtained cash price data from 60,186 pharmacies (35,976 chain and 24,210 independent). The nationwide mean cash price per unit (PPU) ranged from $8.6 ± 5.2 (sildenafil 20 mg at chain pharmacies) to $107.1 ± 71 (Adcirca 20 mg at independent pharmacies) equal to 1145.3% difference. Chain pharmacies provided significantly lower average prices for one brand-name and six generic PDE5 inhibitors. Tadalafil PPU was cheaper at higher quantities, however, PPU increased with quantity prescribed for sildenafil. Looking at the top 10 metropolitan statistical areas, the highest PPUs were observed for tadalafil (Cialis) 10 mg and sildenafil (Viagra) 50 mg in Atlanta ($67.4 ± 8.7) and Los Angeles ($50.3 ± 24.0), while New York ($9.7 ± 2.6) and Miami ($27.9 ± 16.4) had the lowest PPUs for tadalafil (Cialis) 5 mg and sildenafil (Viagra) 100 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION: A substantial variability in PDE5 inhibitor cash prices exists across manufacturer, dosage, quantity, pharmacy type, and location. In addition, the pricing does not necessarily correlate with the regional socioeconomic factors. This highlights the importance of provider awareness and patient counseling on drug price including potentially assisting patients in identifying opportunities for cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Genéricos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5 , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Citrato de Sildenafil , Tadalafilo , New York , Ahorro de Costo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...